Comments on: For Paula and Rose http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/ Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:30:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: Editrix http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-205 Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:13:15 +0000 http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-205 You know, I actually read it as "retired" and didn't notice the typo until Jeff pointed it out. So much for my nom de blog. Thanks for pointing me to the article, Paula! You know, I actually read it as “retired” and didn’t notice the typo until Jeff pointed it out. So much for my nom de blog.

Thanks for pointing me to the article, Paula!

]]> by: Paula http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-204 Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:09:05 +0000 http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-204 Har-dee-har! Har-dee-har!

]]> by: 2fs http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-203 Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:39:51 +0000 http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-203 Retied chimps? I think it's totally wrong that anyone tied them up in the first place! Or maybe that was just a typo - and you meant "refried chips." Much more savory. Retied chimps? I think it’s totally wrong that anyone tied them up in the first place!

Or maybe that was just a typo - and you meant “refried chips.” Much more savory.

]]> by: Paula http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-202 Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:43:24 +0000 http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-202 Ha! I trust y'all saw the Times mag article about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/24/magazine/24CHIMPS.html?" rel="nofollow">retied chimps</a>? Ha! I trust y’all saw the Times mag article about retied chimps?

]]> by: Rose http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-201 Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:48:30 +0000 http://www.patheticfallacy.org/2005/07/for-paula-and-rose/#comment-201 I love it! I love it!

]]>